Wednesday, November 10, 2010

F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen by the Zio-Nazis

F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen by the Zio-Nazis

The issue is F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen by the Zio-Nazis.

I am wondering where are those brave Americans? Why aren’t they protecting their nation? Why are they hiding under BURQA? Why are they attacking Muslims like robots?

Faruque Ahmed


Free Australia Now, Mobile: 041 091 4118

--- In, "L" wrote:

Re: F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen - Guess By Whom?

It's WAAAAY past time we found a rope and tree for Jonathan Pollard and others.

--- In, "L" wrote:

Re: F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen - Guess By Whom?

Most Jews don't. So who knows. Most of you are lying FAKES.

--- In, "bruce" wrote:

I am certainly not scared of you and your filthy mates!!! i use my real name you gutless pig!!

cheers Bruce

--- In, "lal_guru@" wrote:

Re: F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen - Guess By Whom?

Are you scared to stand up against Gas Chamber bound Jews?

--- In, "bruce" wrote:

Re: F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen - Guess By Whom?


Cheers Bruce

--- In, "komolarani@..." wrote:

Re: F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen - Guess By Whom?

I suppose this is also the fault of the Muslims!

--- In, "Biplobi Faruque" wrote:

Re: F-35 Fighter Secrets Stolen - Guess By Whom?

Zionised and enslaved Americans will hate Muslims and Kiss Israeli arses.



November 2, 2010 posted by Gordon Duff · 149 Comments

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter worthless?


By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

"Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby."

On April 21, 2009, the Department of Defense announced the theft of 1.5 terabytes of data on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the platform meant give the United States and her allies air superiority for the next 40 years. In a flash, all that was gone, $300 billion dollars of funding down the drain, every system, defense, offense, stealth, everything needed to build one or shoot it down, all gone. Day one, China was accused but it wasn't China, it wasn't Iran, it wasn't Pakistan. The theft left a clear signature, one identical to the data Wikileaks has been receiving, sources inside the Pentagon repeating the actions of Israeli-Soviet spy, Jonathan Pollard. As vital as the F-35 is to America's defense, Pollard's triumph on behalf of Soviet Russia and Israel dwarfs the current espionage coup.

Since the 2009 announcement, there has been nothing but silence.

When the theft was announced, Pentagon "damage control" went into action immediately branding the disaster as "unimportant" while scrambling to look for any possible way to "put the toothpaste back into the tube." What Secretary Gates came up with was a simple denial and to pretend it never happened. With the continual efforts by the Israeli government to secure the release of master spy Jonathan Pollard, a "witch hunt" for another Israeli spy would endanger America's hopes of winning a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians.

There was no real question, this was another Israeli operation, their "signature" was all over it.


What did America lose? 15 years of research and development? That doesn't come close. Key components of the F-35, from stealth materials, flight and weapons systems, to tens of thousands of man-hours of systems programming are now

Carrier at Sea

Additional Risk for U.S. Navy Carriers

"out there," available to any potential rival, military or commercial. At best, it could be considered a $300 billion dollar bank robbery, by American standards, nothing new in today's financial world.

Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby.

At worst, nations whose defense capabilities were decades behind the US can now be at par, as the F-35 was estimated to be "air superiority capable" until at least 2040. Data stolen could make production of a comparable aircraft possible in as little as 36 months, particularly with several projects in the offing, Russia/India and in China, each of which are capable of quickly adapting upgraded systems.

The JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) in its three variants, conventional takeoff/landing (CTOL), carrier variant (CV) and short takeoff/vertical landing (STOLV), are scheduled for production through 2026 with estimates of service life until 2060 and beyond. Export versions of the F-35, "detuned" are available for American allies, NATO and Israel. The F-35 delivers more "punch" per dollar than any current "legacy" fighter by a margin of as much as 8 to 1. The economics of "stealing" the F-35 and auctioning it off, system at a time, is tremendous.

Any nation with a substantial defense industry will have immediately gained a decade or more in, not just stealth fighter/bomber design, but hundreds of areas of science applicable to UAV drones, missiles, including nuclear ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles), and smaller missile systems, not only air defense but against helicopters and armour as well. Every advanced technology America has is in the F-35 somewhere.

Stealth technology from the F-35 can be adapted to the guidance systems stolen and transferred to China, believed by Israel also, technology that threatens America's ability to project air superiority through use of its aircraft carriers. Conventional missiles, not believed capable of "taking out" America's carriers can be upgraded to defeat air defense systems years from being off the drawing boards.


In March, 1999, on the 4th day of American involvement in the Bosnian war, Serbian forces shot down an F-117 stealth bomber using a Soviet SA 300 air defense system with radar modifications based on data secured through espionage.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Data on the resonant frequencies of the materials and surfaces of the F-117 made it possible for radar to, not only detect a plane previously believed "invisible' at a range of 13 kilometers, but to successfully destroy one, an embarrassment the US feels the sting of even today.

The stolen data on the F-35 covers more than simple materials but all jamming and other defensive systems and performance characteristics. Air defense systems can now be tuned specifically to find only the F-35 if so required.


In 2008, British based BAE Systems, a subcontractor for Lockheed Martin, was discovered to have allowed access to highly classified F-35 technologies through, not only physical access to its facilities but lack of normal computer safeguards. POGO (Project On Government Oversight), a whistleblower/watchdog group, learned of the Pentagon's lack of normal project security safeguards and requested a copy of the Inspector General's security report. Though documents showed the Pentagon was aware that key weapons systems had been compromised in Britain, well before 2008, security at project facilities in the United States was not brought up to required standards.

Defense Security Service audits from as early as 2001 had not been filed and the agreement with British contractors allowed them to refuse to report to the Department of Defense on an "at will" basis. In fact, the agreement with Britain contained no guarantees of any kind for security and no functioning authority to limit spying.


Wikileaks are called "leaks." Julian Assange darts from country to country, hotel to TV studio, always ahead of the security forces hunting him down, a veritable "Nordic" bin Laden. Newspapers are peppered with photographs of a boyish face in the uniform of the American army, identified as the potential "leaker." The 46,000 intelligence/counter-intelligence officers of the Department of Defense, supplemented by the FBI and 16 other agencies and 40 other departments, more "bodies" than currently serve in Afghanistan, we are told, are unable to rein in this "dangerous duo."

Documents by the hundreds of thousands are leaked, upon qualified examination, showing careful screening with many documents edited and more selected out of series with careful gaps and omissions. A single non-commissioned officer, watched 24 hours a day by tens of thousands of security officers and threatened with life in prison, is an unlikely suspect. However, there has been no mention of any others nor has there been a mention of an investigation of any kind. In fact, there seems to me no attempt whatsoever to curtail these current leaks.

What does this tell us?


It was never announced when, exactly, the theft of the F-35 data occurred. The press release was April 21. 2009, long enough after President Bush left office for the blame to evade his administration, one infamous for "leaks" such as the "Scooter" Libby (Liebowitz) "outing" of CIA nuclear proliferation specialist Valerie Plame.

Israeli citizen, Jonathan Pollard, convicted for spying on America and sentenced to life in prison in 1987, is, we believe but can never be sure of, the most successful spy in world history. As with the F-35, the "cover story" is always carefully deceptive as to not panic the public or cause a lack of confidence, perhaps rightly so, in America's ability to secure secrets. Pollard had two primary targets, our nuclear response capability and NATO's defense capabilities against the Soviet Union. Both were destroyed by Pollard whose materials were passed through Israel directly to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War.

Every weapon design, yes, our stealth aircraft capabilities and our NATO battle plans were among the truckload of papers Pollard sold to Israel, a country where he is considered a national hero. Pollard may have been our last "paper" spy. Everything today is electronic and spies who steal American secrets can be compared to unruly chatroom members or video game enthusiasts.

Despite the "cute" attempt by the Department of Defense and Secretary Gates to refer to espionage as "hacking," there is nothing either innocent or harmless about it. As all data is formatted for electronic media and secured by firewalls and passwords, all espionage is "hacking."

The difference between "leaking" and "spying" is semantics. The goal is the same, destruction of the defense capabilities of the United States, except "spying" pays better.

The people responsible for each, particularly when they access the same systems and overcome the same roadblocks, all requiring the same physical access, are one in the same. Those who "leak" perform an identical task to those who spy. Those who leak, those who have leaked appear to be, to any reasonable person, exactly the same people who are spying now and who were supporting Pollard.

The first place we look, before new Russian, Indian, Iranian or Chinese version of the F-35 take flight or our first F-35 meets a fiery end is Israel. No Chinese or Pakistani's or Iranians have gained by the F-35 espionage "clone" operations styled after "Wikileaks." Wikileaks has proven one thing, there is a major spy operation in the Pentagon with broad access. It is immune to investigation. Only political power can generate this kind of protection.

Assange is a recipient of information he likely believes is real. Our investigations prove different. The Pentagon leaks were carefully edited, thousands of reports were reconstructed and falsified and hundreds of thousands were removed as inconsistent with an unknown political agenda. This requires full access to Pentagon computer systems, PROMIS software and hundreds of man hours.

It requires, in fact, a broad spy operation inside the Pentagon that enjoys its ability to operate with impunity. Wikileaks carries an Israeli signature, the leaks damn only Israeli enemies, shield Israeli operations and are time to serve Israeli interests. Hundreds of Israeli citizens work in the Pentagon. None of this should be a surprise to anyone.

The F-35 debacle is exactly the same. Where there was some cursory discussion of investigation Wikileaks, the F-35 thefts were, can we say "forgiven?"



--- In, "L" wrote:

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

What Was The Status of The Athenian Women?

What Was The Status of The Athenian Women?

In Athens, women were not better off than either the Indian or the Roman women: “Athenian women were always minors, subject to some male - to their father, to their brother, or to some of their male kin.” (Allen, E. A., History of Civilization). Her consent in marriage was not generally thought to be necessary and “she was obliged to submit to the wishes of her parents, and receive from them her husband and her lord, even though he were stranger to her.” (Previous Source)

Abridged from:

Monday, May 17, 2010

Burqa for Rev Fred Nile

Burqa for Rev Fred Nile

Further to I Love Osama bin Laden and Anti-Muslim Conspiracy Galore in the Australian Media the political opportunist Rev Fred Nile is conducting modern day Inquisition, Conquistador and Crusade from Australia through his Christian Democratic Party.

His intolerant version of Christianity expelled tolerant Christian leader like Rev Gordon Moyes. Even his own children do not follow his divisive and vitriolic religious path. However, his anti-Muslim and anti-homosexual platforms gave him a cushy Parliamentary position since 1981.

Last week he spoke out against short dress, small bra and bikinis! This week he changed his mind and speaking out against burqa. Main stream media outlets and politicians are ignoring his idiocy. However, some tabloid media outlets are playing with him.

Generally speaking, burqa is not a political issue in Australia. However, his ill-motivated vendetta against Muslims making many people cranky and they are asking Fred Nile to wear Burqa and leave everyone alone.

Anti-Muslim Conspiracy Galore in the Australian Media


Are You a Party to This Conspiracy John?, Mike Jeffreys of 2UE and His Mission against Muslims, Rev Bill Crews and Burqa and are only a few more examples of Anti-Muslim Conspiracy!

Do You Think Osama bin Laden Is guilty or Innocent? and Who Invented Osama to Slaughter Arabs and Muslims? are further examples of Anti-Muslim Conspiracy too.

Are You a Party to This Conspiracy John?


John Kerr appears to be one of the better radio announcers of Sydney. One night, in his 2UE Midnight to Dawn Program he allowed someone to say a few good words about Muslims. Shortly thereafter he disappeared from the radio and later came back at a much smaller weekend show only. One can assume that he may have been punished by some one for some reason. Possibly for allowing someone to say something good about Muslims as it is unusual in this town!

Faruque Ahmed has been fighting for truthful and accurate reporting. During the process he made a few powerful enemies and lots of good friends. Legend says, some radio stations have installed "Faruque Meter" and they do not pick up his phone calls and they also do not provide him air time too. The use many tricks and techniques to silence him and some of those scenarios are narrated in Convicted Genes Oriented Judgment? and Lawless and Gutless Chris Smith of 2GB. Nonetheless, his long association with talk back radio are appreciated by the community in general and loathed by the influential Israetards, Israeo-Nazis and Zio-Nazis!

Last week the producer of John Kerr failed to call back Faruque Ahmed without any valid reason. Last night (Sunday Morning, May 09, 2010), both Faruque Ahmed and the producer of John Kerr had a nice chuckle about a few issues after midnight. The producer also promised Faruque to call back about the carefully crafted and nurtured anxiety and paranoia over the `burqa' issue. During the program a few people made a few untrue and devious claims about Muslims and burqa to incite against Muslims. Some of those claims were accidentally exposed during the show too. One pro-Muslim contributor also got the unusual axe during the conversation! Nonetheless, no one called Faruque!! It happened, even a couple of time during the shift the programmed died down due to lack of contributors.

Suspicious Faruque rang back after 4.00 AM and made some inquiries. The well spoken producer was defensive and friendly with Faruque. However, Faruque smashed the defense line by saying, "only a few minutes ago a female caller made very unusual claim against Islam and Muslims deliberately to cause injury to Muslims" (paraphrasing). The producer was moved a bit and he promised him to give air time next week. During that conversation Faruque also reasoned with the producer that it is fairly clear that someone is censoring against Faruque!

Faruque Ahmed is the author of Belgian Prejudice and Bigotry and many other webs, blogs, sites (Crimes Exposed, Sydney Taxi Corruption, …) and documents! All of those instruments are good enough to destroy and weaken lies, prejudice, bigotry and vendetta promoted by many disturbing media outlets!

Therefore, the obvious question is, "are you a party to this conspiracy John"?

5/9/2010 6:56:03 PM

Mike Jeffreys of 2UE and His Mission against Muslims

For more: Sites

Mike Jeffreys is afraid of debate. He hides behind four walls and telephone operators. Today (Monday, 10 May 2010) he allowed a professional caller named "Debbie" without any question whatsoever. This "Debbie" has been sprouting anti-Muslim sentiments at every available radio shows and stations using questionable stories about burqa. Mike Jeffreys also allowed another caller "Mohammed" to incite against Muslims in a very cunning way. I suspect both of them could be similar to Australian Reporter according to Australian values, culture and tradition. Surely people like them gave us Australia, Australian values and Psyche and consistently inciting against many groups of people like Muslim Hunt Continuum and Australian Media and The Sydney Morning Herald and Zionised Erik Jensen.

Last time (from my memory) Mike made a few allegations against me. When I asked him to substantiate those allegations, he failed miserably in his own show! Since then he is not giving me any opportunity to talk to his show.

Surely nothing is stopping Mike to use valid information of Rev Bill Crews and Burqa or provide us a right of reply before embarking on a mission against Muslims! He is also welcome to place his response in those links should he wish to do so.

Faruque Ahmed

Moderator, Free Australia Now

Mobile: 041 091 4118, Monday, May 10, 2010

Rev Bill Crews and Burqa

Rev Bill Crews comes across as a tolerant preacher and broadcaster. I have had a few nice conversations with him over the years. I also felt, many "Christians" do not like his style too.

Today, he was trying to start a conversion about Burqa and I rang his radio program after 8.00 PM without any success. However, when I used a different phone, I got through easily and I spoke to his producer. He told me, the board is full and he won't be able to call me back! I hope it is not a blockade.

Earlier, I was compelled to say, "… Most importantly, Australian media outlets including talk back radios are audaciously manipulative, explicitly restricted, brazenly robotic and drifting from reality … " in Convicted Genes Oriented Judgment?.

Rev Bill Crews and his staffs may tell us more about this issue anyway.

I made attempts in Burkah, Fear and Paranoia Based on Prejudice and Bigotry, Belgian Prejudice and Bigotry and other forums to say that ignorance, prejudice and bigotry has overtaken the burqa debate and the real people are not getting an opportunity to say anything about this issue or any other issues for that matter as evidenced by my experience. To the best of my knowledge, many decent Muslims have made attempts to communicate with the wider world without a good success and many of them virtually gave up unlike me.

I have been trying to communicate but brick walls and bulldozers are trying to decimate me!

I hope Rev bill Crews may clear the air in this regard.

With thanks.

Faruque Ahmed

Moderator, Free Australia Now

Mobile: 041 091 4118, Sunday, May 09, 2010

Burkah, Fear and Paranoia Based on Prejudice and Bigotry

I don't care whether some one wears a burkah or not. But I do care if some one is forced to wear a burkah I also care if burkah is used to commit any crime. To the best of my knowledge I have not seen any statistics in this regard. However, I have heard can be, could be, may be, might be, … types of supposition, and possibility billions of time. These types of irrational and illogical fear and paranoia based on prejudice and bigotry are prevalent in our society.

The former Prime Minister of Australia John Howard managed to win two un-winnable elections by using fear and paranoia based on prejudice and bigotry. His last bastion was the Northern Territory Intervention at the expense of Aboriginal people. Yet, after all of this vicious and creative propaganda:

1. Not one person was prosecuted for sexual abuse.

2. Not one hospital was built.

3. Not one school was built.

In this occasion, half Israeli Nicolas Sarkozy got many personal and political failures. In order to divert attention from his own shortcomings he has abused and misused the burkah issue. Yet, it is not an issue in the French media. However, burkah is the headline news in some countries including Australia due to the never ending vendetta of some ill-motivated tabloid media and other instrumentalities.

By the way, no one is telling non-Muslims how to dress, eat or behave. Yet every Tom, dick and Harry thinks that they have got some divine rights to tell the Muslims what to do or not to do! Why is it so? May I ask?

Is it because Islam and Arab bashing is the most popular sport in the town?

People who seek moral guidance from the toilet blocks of suburbia scream about the burkah and become self appointed saviors of Muslim women! Isn't it funny and peculiar?

Anthropologically the pagans, Jews, Christians and many non Muslims used to wear the burkah and still they do to seek protection from the nature and environment. Burkah got many advantages in some environment and it is not a tool of oppression or anything of that nature. It could be a fixation of some people.

So, let's remove prejudice and bigotry from the burkah debate and think freely.

Faruque Ahmed


Free Australia Now

Mobile: 041 091 4118

Monday, 01/03/2010

Email: union_faruque@...

For more : Crimes Exposed

Why Murdochian Empire Won't Publish All Comments re Burqa?

For more: Comments Murdochian Empire Won't Publish and Published re Burqa



Message #1.

Many Christians are forcing incestuous relations with their daughters and having children too! Did the Muslims lecture those non-Muslims on how to lead their life?

Why then the non-Muslims are lecturing Muslims based on pure prejudice and ignorance? Published

Message #2.

Many "Australian" women smoke marijuana, sniff heroin, snort cocaine, display their boobs along with their ass and assholes! Do you want Muslims women to those things to be accepted in Australia?

Message #3.

Many "Australians" are telling other Australians to go back to their ancestral lands because they do not like their views or "Middle Eastern" way of life. Why then Australia refuse to reject Middle Eastern religion like Judaism and Christianity? Published

Message #4.

Temple Mount and Covenant of Umar I are testimony of Islamic tolerance in comparison with many historic tragedies and injustices including Inquisition, Conquistador and misguided Crusades. Surely, removal of prejudice and bigotry will assist some people to understand history beyond propaganda.

Message #5.

Non-Muslim state sponsored terrorism emanating, from cruise missiles, bombers, helicopters, tanks, machine guns, cannons, radio and television stations, newspapers, banks, defense establishments, state and UN instruments in Muslim peoples schoolyards, backyards and Mums' cradle! Why don't you stop them first before taking about the so called strap bombs!

For more:

Message #6.

Due to absence of opportunity to prosecute Catholics, may be time is right to prosecute Muslims. You see John Howard's prejudicial and ill-motivated Northern Territory intervention failed to prosecute one person for sexual abuse as well as failed to build one hospital or a school too!

Debacle like this one is not the first and last for the White man and they won't stop, be that illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq or Burqa Conspiracy. Published

--- In, "Biplobi Faruque" wrote:

Belgian Prejudice and Bigotry

For more: Crimes Exposed

The Europeans used to hate the "Christ Killer Jews". Ironically, the Jews incorrectly and improperly coined it as `anti-Semitism". They are also misusing and abusing this terminology to silence and suffocate the truth!

The Muslims used to provide shelter to the Jews. To day, children of those Jews are paying back to Muslims according to their own tradition i.e. insulting and attacking Muslims and Arabs at every available opportunity.

Today, many Israetards imposed themselves to far too many American, European, … countries! They are basically telling these countries to stop Muslim and Arab immigration and even encouraging expulsion of these groups too. However, at the same time, the same Israetards and Israeo-Nazis are also directly and indirectly assisting/financing/supporting ethnic cleansing of Muslims and Arabs from their own homelands!

Further to Burkah, Fear and Paranoia Based on Prejudice and Bigotry below 30 women out of 600 000 Belgium Muslims wear burqa. To date, neither of them forced to wear these garments, nor did they use burqa to commit any crimes!! Yet, the Belgium authorities are trying to impose the burqa bulldozer legislation against only 30 women!?!

It appears this is another form of prejudice and bigotry against Muslims and Arabs under the guise of Liberation of Women by the enemy of Muslims under the patronage of the Israetards and Israeo-Nazis to pay back old debt to the Muslims and Arabs!!

Friday, April 23, 2010

No law agency advice to ban burqa: PM

AAP May 7, 2010, 4:49 pm

"He (Bernardi) goes out there and says that's what he wants to do," he told the Seven Network on Friday.

"Mr Abbott then says it's not their policy... they are walking both sides of the street."

Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott later agreed the Islamic burqa was a "confronting" and "challenging" form of clothing.

Neither Ms Gillard nor Mr Abbott said their parties proposed banning the garment worn by some Islamic women.

"It was a personal view of Corey's, it's not a Liberal party policy," Mr Abbott told the Nine Network.

"I find it a pretty challenging form of attire and I would prefer it wasn't widely worn."

Ms Gillard said she understood the feelings of Australians about the burqa and wanted schools to teach equality between men and women.

"I can understand Australians that do find it a bit confronting, it's a little different on our streets," she told the Nine Network.

"It's something for people to think about, I don't think it actually makes a difference trying to ban an article of clothing, I'm not sure that's what we want to do.

"We want to make sure there is teaching in our schools and society generally that men and women are equal."

Australian Greens spokeswoman on the status of women Sarah Hanson-Young said Abbott and Bernardi have zero credibility as advocates for women's rights.

"If people want to start banning items of apparel, perhaps we could start with budgie-smugglers?" Senator Hanson-Young told AAP.

"I personally find them quite offensive."

Fitness fanatic Mr Abbott is often filmed and photographed running around in his Speedo swimmers.

Source: Blog and Sites

Do You Think Osama bin Laden is guilty or Innocent?

Yahoo Questions and Answers

In any civilized society each and everyone is innocent until and unless proven guilty or other wise.

Now, could you kindly let me knew, which court, judge or jury convicted Osama bin Laden of any crime; let alone terrorism?

Please do not bog down about the so called confession as we have many innocents in the US prison due to "confession" and many of them cleared by higher technology and courts.

Most importantly, the brilliant CIA and FBI were so desperate about Osama bin laden! It is not funny!! They have to doctor a photograph of a Spanish politician to make it look like bin Laden!!!

It is sickening.

On the other hand, the case against CIA, FBI and Israel are overwhelming. Many 9/11 Investigations and Reports are smelly.

So, at the end do not forget the word, "beyond reasonable doubt". I say so while I do not like people like bin Laden.

Who Invented Osama to Slaughter the Arabs and Muslims?

Burqa and Enemy

Bin Laden used t be `morally equivalent of American founding fathers'! Osama used to be the pin up boy of the corporate governments!! Secular and nationalists movements around the world used to be enemies of USA and religious extremists were invented and funded by USA, UK and other entities.

One day, the American Terrorist Leader Bush was playing with Billy the goat and we found out about the so called 9/11. All planes of USA were grounded except those ones escorting the precious Bin Laden clans to safe heavens!

Steel structured concrete buildings of Twin Towers melted like volcanic lava. Yet, the passport of the ring leader Mohammad Atta flew into the FBI desk!

Anyway, none of those so called hijackers were originated from Afghanistan. Yet, Afghanistan was attacked and ruined due to pipe line dream and opium trade. Iraq had nothing to do with Bin Laden or 9/11! Yet, the Illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq is well-known as Iraq: A War For Israel and Iraq pullout would hurt Israel but totally ignored by the compliant media and establishments.

In short they are running a crusade! They are using Bin Laden as a reason. Their modern day Inquisition, Conquistador and Crusade are much more brutal and vitriolic than old ones! Therefore it becomes a must to ask the following questions:

1. Who have elected Osama bin Laden as the leader of the Muslim world?

2. Since when and under what authority Osama bin Laden became spokes person or the undisputed leader of the Muslim and Arab world?

3. Since when and under what authority Osama bin Laden became `Pope' of the Arab and Muslim world?

4. Why Muslims and Arabs have to be guilty of alleged crimes of Osama bin Laden?

5. Who are behind these deadly games and why?